^ This result might be less repugnant if B’s estate were able to recover in negligence, but taking the relational structure of the negligence tort at face value would preclude such a recovery as well. For the defendant’s lack of due care, in such a case, is not a lack of due care toward B. (If this is not clear, we can fill in the details of the case to make it clear: For example, suppose that the defendant has good but misleading evidence to believe that B has given enthusiastic and informed consent, for amply sufficient remuneration, to being sprayed by the gas.) What makes it culpable and wrongful to spray the gas, in such a case, clearly has nothing to do with B: It is the fact that A clearly does not consent that puts the defendant in breach. Although B is not an unforeseeable victim, she is nevertheless not wrongfully treated; allowing her a negligence recovery would run afoul of Cardozo’s insistence that the negligence plaintiff must sue for a wrong personal to her.
FT App on Android & iOS
，详情可参考币安 binance
reading the config can see exactly which parts will become cleaner
Leaders who can see the full picture of labor, pay and performance make faster, smarter calls about hiring, scheduling and spending.